FARMING

 

FARMINGFARMING

 

 

 

Modern-day agriculture is a huge contributor to our planet's problems. How huge? 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions come from world agriculture.

Here's why:

About 10,000 years ago, we began to farm. Why keep roaming around hunting food like cavemen when we could grow it like civilized Homo sapiens? We settled in warmer climates where the soil was best. As settlements grew, more land was cleared to make way for farming. Fast forward a few millennia, and many places had no more land to spare. No worries: Colonialism was born. New land, new opportunities. Think about all the regions in the world that have been altered forever for farming: the forests of New Zealand cleared for sheep, North American prairie cultivated for cattle, wheat and corn. Three quarters of China was originally forested; now, only 5% remains covered by trees. In the U.S., all but 6% of old-growth forests have been cleared. Half of the world's tropical forests have been cleared since World War II, mostly for agriculture. There wasn’t much choice. We, as a species, grew. And so did our appetite.

Now nobody is saying agriculture has to go. Obviously. That would be suicide on a number of levels, like most importantly, food and economics. But just consider what it does to the planet:

Today it takes 20 times more energy to produce the same amount of food it took in 1910. That’s because farms are becoming super-farms, running on gas, diesel and ultra-souped-up barn equipment. 38 million kilograms of pesticide are used every year in Canada. Just one of those kilograms of pesticide releases 3.7 kilograms of greenhouse gases.1 Brutal!

Primary agriculture is responsible for about 12% of Canada's greenhouse gases. Most of that comes from the methane in manure and the nitrous oxide from fertilizers. It doesn’t even include the greenhouse gases emitted from transportation or agri-food processing. Think of all the energy required for milling, refining, refrigerating and packaging.2 Eek.

Primary agriculture in Canada accounts for 61% of nitrous oxide emissions and 38% of methane. We know how bad methane is. 30% of Canada’s total greenhouse gas emissions from the agri-food industry comes from Alberta.4

And consider this grossness: Canadian livestock produced 164 billion kilograms of manure in 2001. That's enough to fill Toronto's Rogers Centre 103 times per year, or almost twice a week. Livestock manure has 30 times more polluting power than human waste. If it gets into surface water, it can kill fish and cause serious groundwater pollution.5

Until modern intensive farming really started to rev up in the mid-20th century, soil was one of the planet’s more hardy carbon sinks, absorbing 75% of the carbon found on land. When land is cultivated it loses 20 to 50% of its organic matter. Cultivation also releases stored carbon into the atmosphere and contributes to erosion and salinization.6

You may not be ready to go vegetarian, but you can start thinking about where your food is coming from and the energy consumed to create it. An easy start? Remember the rule of thumb: Buy local, buy seasonal, buy organic.

 

Want to know more about our (d)evolving food industry? Check out The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan.

 

 

 


1,4 Source: http://www.greenlearning.ca/climate-change/solutions/food/food_selection.php
2,3 Source: http://www.agr.gc.ca/policy/environment/air_03_e.phtml
5 Source: http://www.environmentaldefence.ca/reports/farm.htm
6 Source: http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Science/Forests_And_Sinks.asp

 

 

Submitted by peterspruit on Thu, 2007-10-04 22:51.
i live on a dairy farm and all our manure is put in a concrete pit where it never seeps into the soil. I wouldn't say stop eating meat because our beef industry is a such a critically time since the borders to US just opened first time in 4 years. with the high Canadain dollar, beef is still not the way it used to be. if anything we should stop buying fruit out of california since it takes 1000 miles to get to grocery store. another thing farmers are doing is a biogas pits. these manure storages use the methane to produce power(thumbs up). the only promblem is it is to expensive because cost of hydro isn't as high as Europe and the average herd is 65 cows and to afford the system the farm should have well over 250 cows.
Submitted by hawk lover on Fri, 2007-10-05 12:41.
When the natives ruled the land there were literally millions of buffalo wandering the plains of Canada. They produced far more manure than what's there today. Think about it, people.
Submitted by Ceravee on Fri, 2008-02-15 10:38.
The problem isn't that animals are producing manure, the problem is that such a large number of animals are living in such small spaces on factory farms and CAFOs so their manure is being concentrated in one area. The nitrogen within the manure is polluting the land because the land can only absorb and make use of so much. If farming were to return to its pastoral roots, the animals (and the manure they produce) would improve instead of harm our environment. Manure plays a huge role in providing much-needed nutrients to the grasses and plants, and assists greatly in the nourishing and spreading of seeds. If animals were raised responsibly with a greater concern for their natural instincts and the health of our planet, we would all benefit.
Submitted by cassy o on Mon, 2008-02-11 18:30.
i agree with your logic, but its not just manure that is causing all of the problems; we are also using many gas powered machines that pollute the enviroment. Plus the animals that went around in the wild and were naturally supposted to be there, so everything the ummm... got rid of was part of a natural cycle. Now, there are farms in areas that weren't naturally designed to hold animals
Submitted by annie1000 on Tue, 2007-10-09 16:50.
i have to agree with Timothy's comment. Those wild animals roaming free also look up the space of huge industrialized cities which produce tons and tons more CO2 than any animal ever could. The point now is that the manure created by farmed cattle is somewhat unnecessary considering we could all live healthy lives as vegetarians. So cattle become one place where we have to potential to diminish our carbon footprint. And last I checked there was nothing wrong with knowing the facts, knowing our options, and making informed decisions.
Submitted by emily002 on Mon, 2007-10-29 11:25.
Are you trying to say that cows are bad?..i dont really know about you, but we do eat meat..and manure is a natural thing, and just because cows do produce CO2 with their manure doesnt mean they should become extinct or be banned for that reason, and that reason alone..Im sure that at one point in your life you have eaten meat, or drank milk...you cant blame cow farmers for the CO2 admissions in the air..you cant forget about the millions of people living in cities driving their expensive cars, and their HUGE appartment buildings with their AC, and the office buildings that have lights on 24/7..keep in mind that Farmers Feed Cities..
Submitted by Timothy D on Fri, 2007-10-05 13:34.
There were also alot less cars, power plants, and waaaaaaaay more forested land...When Canada was established there were around 3 million people, there are now over 3 million in Toronto alone. Before Canada was established and the Natives ruled the land there were even less people here. Now you think about it
Submitted by xoxo_Rawwrr on Tue, 2007-07-17 23:13.
Wow Thats Pretty bad i Mean Ya... We Need The Stuff They Provide But i can't even say it, that so sad. My Uncle is a farmer and i never really noticed what they were doing to the planet! Harsh!